2013 CFED Scorecard

Financial Assets & Income

Outcome Measures

Income Poverty Rate

Asset Poverty Rate

Asset Poverty by Race

Asset Poverty by Gender

Asset Poverty by Family Structure

Liquid Asset Poverty Rate

Liquid Asset Poverty by Race

Liquid Asset Poverty by Gender

Liquid Asset Poverty by Family Structure

Extreme Asset Poverty Rate

Net Worth

Net Worth by Race

Net Worth by Income

Net Worth by Gender

Net Worth by Family Structure

Unbanked Households

Underbanked Households

Households with Savings Accounts

Consumers with Subprime Credit

Borrowers 90+ Days Overdue

Average Credit Card Debt

Bankruptcy Rate

Policy Priorities

Tax Credits for Working Families

State IDA Program Support

Lifting Asset Limits in Public Benefit Programs

Protections from Predatory Short-Term Loans

Additional Policies

Income Tax Threshold

Tax Burden by Income

Prize-Linked Savings

Paperless Payday

Trend Indicators

Change in Net Worth

Change in Asset Poverty

Change in Liquid Asset Poverty

Change in Consumers with Subprime Credit

Change in Average Credit Card Debt

Businesses & Jobs

Housing & Homeownership

Health Care

Education

CFED Assets & Opportunity Scorecard

Liquid Asset Poverty by Gender

Reports & Graphics

Definition

Ratio of the liquid asset poverty rate of single male-headed households to single female-headed households, 2010.

Calculated by dividing the higher value by the lower value, i.e., single female-headed households divided by single male-headed households, except in Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Missouri, Oklahoma and Wisconsin where single male-headed households have higher rates of liquid asset poverty.

A ratio of 1 indicates perfect equality; the higher the ratio, the greater the inequality. For example, the liquid asset poverty rate for single male-headed households in Missouri is 1.3 times higher than for single female-headed households.

Data are point estimates produced from a national survey with relatively small samples for some states, which can result in imprecise estimates and ranks. States are not ranked on this measure due to insufficient data at the state level. For more information on how we measured precision and to download margin of error data for each state, see here.

Description

This measure describes the disparity in liquid asset poverty between single male- and single female-headed households. Nationally, liquid asset poverty is 1.09 (or 9%) higher for single women than it is for single men, indicating that these households are more vulnerable to a financial crisis and less able to meet emergency family needs. However, liquid asset poverty is higher for men in six of the 30 states for which data is available.

The Scorecard compares single households in gender comparisons rather than all male- and female-headed households to disentangle issues of gender from marital status. For more information on wealth disparities by gender, see the work of Mariko Lin Chang.

toggle page width

Liquid Asset Poverty by Gender

StateLiquid Asset Poverty,
Single Male-Headed
Households (%)
Liquid Asset Poverty,
Single Female-Headed
Households (%)
Ratio
United States  52.0%  56.5%  1.09 
Alabama  72.2%  75.1%  1.04 
Alaska  —  —  — 
Arizona  47.7%  53.9%  1.13 
Arkansas  —  63.0%  — 
California  48.7%  54.1%  1.11 
Colorado  55.6%  51.5%  1.08 
Connecticut  —  47.9%  — 
Delaware  —  —  — 
District of Columbia  —  —  — 
Florida  60.4%  59.6%  1.01 
Georgia  66.8%  66.5%  1.01 
Hawaii  —  —  — 
Idaho  —  —  — 
Illinois  50.9%  56.2%  1.10 
Indiana  52.0%  57.2%  1.10 
Iowa  35.5% * 40.2%  1.13 
Kansas  —  39.8%  — 
Kentucky  55.6%  62.5%  1.13 
Louisiana  58.9%  65.9%  1.12 
Maine  —  —  — 
Maryland  45.9%  52.7%  1.15 
Massachusetts  47.1%  49.1%  1.04 
Michigan  46.0%  56.8%  1.23 
Minnesota  34.8% * 36.3%  1.04 
Mississippi  61.5%  69.9%  1.14 
Missouri  63.2%  47.6%  1.33 
Montana  —  —  — 
Nebraska  —  —  — 
Nevada  —  —  — 
New Hampshire  —  —  — 
New Jersey  52.4%  55.7%  1.06 
New Mexico  —  60.4%  — 
New York  50.8%  59.1%  1.16 
North Carolina  63.8%  64.1%  1.01 
North Dakota  —  —  — 
Ohio  49.7%  59.9%  1.20 
Oklahoma  61.1%  50.6%  1.21 
Oregon  34.2%  50.2%  1.47 
Pennsylvania  48.0%  52.7%  1.10 
Rhode Island  —  —  — 
South Carolina  49.3%  68.0%  1.38 
South Dakota  —  —  — 
Tennessee  67.5%  68.1%  1.01 
Texas  57.1%  61.1%  1.07 
Utah  —  —  — 
Vermont  —  —  — 
Virginia  41.6%  49.8%  1.20 
Washington  39.0%  42.8%  1.10 
West Virginia  —  66.3% * — 
Wisconsin  47.4%  45.6%  1.04 
Wyoming  —  —  — 

Source

Survey of Income and Program Participation, 2008 Panel, Wave 7. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau, 2010. Data calculated by the Bay Area Council Economic Institute.

"—" indicates that no data is available, or data is suppressed due to a margin of error that is greater than 50% of the estimate.

Footnotes

* Indicates that the margin of error is greater than 25% of the estimate, and as such, this estimate is too imprecise to rank. Caution should be used when using this data.

Copyright © 2013 CFED — Corporation for Enterprise Development 1200 G Street, NW Suite 400 Washington, DC 20005 202.408.9788

Powered by ARCOS